Search Results
| Month: | 2016-07 | Remove Month: 2016-07 |
‘Newcastle Youth Offending Team (YOT) was delivering satisfactory work with children and young people….Governance and leadership at Partnership Board level was unsatisfactory…’
28 July 2016 | Archive – youth inspections
‘…Coventry YOS was performing well in most areas of practice. Case managers were engaging children and young people from the outset of their supervision, as well as their parents/carers.’
20 July 2016 | Archive – youth inspections
‘…we found that Nottingham City was a high performing YOT. Case managers were enthusiastic and knowledgeable, using an inclusive style to complete their assessments and plans and maximise positive outcomes. They engaged well with other workers and agencies to identify the individual needs…’
13 July 2016 | Archive – youth inspections
‘…we found some impressive staff delivering generally high-quality work. There were, however, a small number of cases where difficulties experienced around implementation of the AssetPlus assessment and planning framework coincided with work that was of a lower standard.’
13 July 2016 | Archive – youth inspections
‘Northumberland YOT was doing exceptional work with children and young people. All case managers were skilled, knowledgable and committed to helping children and young people to make positive changes in their lives.’
06 July 2016 | Archive – youth inspections
Referral orders are the most common community sentence for young people. They are more effective than other youth sentences in reducing reoffending, but they are not being delivered as government intended.
05 July 2016 | Thematics - HMI Probation only
