Children and young people released from young offender institutions are getting too little support in the community and are being “set up to fail”, according to a new report.

HM Inspectorate of Probation and HM Inspectorate of Prisons followed the experiences of 50 children and young people released from all five young offender institutions across England and Wales. Today’s report looks at the support they received from youth justice services in their first three months after release.

Twelve to seventeen-year-old boys and young men who have committed serious or multiple offences are sentenced to detention and training orders, with half the time served in custody and half in the community. Inspectors found the second half of the sentence often did not build on – or even worse, ignored – what had taken place in custody. Of the 50 young people tracked by inspectors:

• 37 needed input from children’s social care services but only six of these received help with resettlement
• only 44 per cent got the specialist support for their substance misuse problems that they should have had after release
• only 11 went into education or training immediately after release.

Chief Inspector of Probation Justin Russell said: “Children and young people are not getting the help they need to prepare for release and to resettle back into the community. There are specific programmes to help individuals prepare for release, but none of the people in our sample attended one.

“We found staff in youth offending teams had little knowledge of the activity that had taken place in custody, and were unable to build on this work in the community.

“Many of these children and young people need help to find accommodation and to get into education, training or employment. Those with substance misuse and mental health issues also need seamless support in the community. If the right services are not in place, these often-vulnerable people are being set up to fail.”

The two Inspectorates published an interim report in August that looked at the experiences of the same group as they prepared for release. Inspectors found frequent examples of poor planning.

Chief Inspector of Prisons Peter Clarke said: “In some cases, planning started just 10 days prior to release or even after release – this is too little, too late to be effective. A lot of the activity that we saw in custody focussed on containing children and young people, managing their behaviour or simply trying to fill their time.”

In the three months after release, half of the group had been subject to police investigation and a further 10 individuals had been convicted of a further offence. Six of the group had gone missing.

Mr Russell concluded: “The Inspectorate published a report on youth resettlement in 2015 and it is immensely disappointing to find that many of the same issues remain.

“Our recent inspection found that a lack of suitable and safe accommodation is still an ongoing problem. Local authority reluctance to pay for accommodation in advance means that some individuals were only informed of their new address on the eve or day of release. And we saw young people being offered accommodation many miles away from family and in places where they did not know anybody. Yet staff did not consider the emotional impact this could have on individuals. It is little wonder that one young man told us he felt ‘like a parcel’ sometimes.

“We have made a number of recommendations in this report aimed at government departments and agencies. There needs to be a national network of community based accommodation for children who pose the highest risks to the public and better coordination between staff in custody and in the community to ensure children and young people get help to plan, prepare and thrive on release. This is not just in the individual’s interests. Their families, communities and society as a whole stand to gain from people living crime-free lives.”

CASE STUDY

Kieron (not his real name) was a young person in care who committed a sexual offence. During his time in custody, he did not attend education sessions or undertake any work to address his sexual offending, despite posing a continued risk to girls and young women. Kieron indicated he wanted to move to a new area on release to avoid reoffending; staff were unable to find alternative accommodation and, on the day before release, he was informed that a space had been found for him at his previous address.

Kieron turned 18 during his time in custody. His status as a Looked After Child meant that he could have continued to receive support from a youth offending team. Instead, he was transferred to adult services, even though it is not clear why staff thought this would be in his best interests. He met his probation officer for the first time just two weeks before release.

On release, Kieron was required to report to a probation office and a police station; his social worker picked him up but neither of them knew the locations. Over the course of his sentence, Kieron had three probation officers, two youth offending team officers, and two social workers. He was allocated and reallocated to two probation offices in different towns. A month after release, Kieron was arrested for a new sexual offence and was recalled to custody.

FACT FILE

There are five young offender institutions across England and Wales:

• YOI Parc (South Wales)
• YOI Cookham Wood (Kent)
• YOI Feltham (London)
• YOI Werrington (Staffordshire)
• YOI Wetherby & Keppel (West Yorkshire).

 

• This report focuses solely on boys and young men who served time in these YOIs (girls and young women aged 12 to 17 are sent to secure training centres).
• In 2017-2018, the monthly population in youth custody was 894 and the average sentence was 16.7 months.
• Nearly 80 per cent of children and young people in custody committed one or more of the following offences: violence against the person, robbery, burglary and sexual offences.

ENDS

Notes to editor

1. The report is available at www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprobation on Tuesday 08 October 2019 00.01.

2. HM Inspectorate of Probation is the independent inspector of youth offending and probation services across England and Wales.

3. HM Inspectorate of Prisons is an independent inspectorate, inspecting places of detention to report on conditions and treatment, and promote positive outcomes for those detained and the public.

4. This inspection focussed on the experiences of 50 boys and young men released from young offender institutions between October 2018 and April 2019. As well as examining the case files, our inspectors interviewed the case managers and children themselves wherever possible. They also used supplementary data and survey results – please see Annex 2 for further details.

5. This report follows an interim report into youth resettlement work in custody, published by the two Inspectorates in August 2019.

6. The ‘Fact file’ includes statistics sourced from the Youth Justice Board’s annual statistics 2017-2018.

7. For media enquiries, please contact Head of Communications Catherine Chan on 07889 405930 or media@hmiprobation.gov.uk (E-mail address).