Skip to content

Humberside 2017

Read more about Humberside 2017

This is HMICFRS’ fourth PEEL (police effectiveness, efficiency and legitimacy) assessment of Humberside Police. PEEL is designed to give the public information about how their local police force is performing in several important areas, in a way that is comparable both across England and Wales, and year on year. The assessment is updated throughout the year with our inspection findings and reports.

The extent to which the force is effective at keeping people safe and reducing crime is not yet graded.

The extent to which the force is efficient at keeping people safe and reducing crime requires improvement.

The extent to which the force is legitimate at keeping people safe and reducing crime is good.

The efficiency and legitimacy inspection findings are published below.

Matt Parr, Her Majesty’s Inspector of Constabulary

Contact Matt Parr

HMI's observations

My overall assessment of Humberside’s performance will be published in spring 2018, following the publication of the effectiveness inspections in March 2018.

Effectiveness

How effective is the force at keeping people safe and reducing crime?

To be graded
View the five questions for effectiveness

Efficiency

How efficient is the force at keeping people safe and reducing crime?

Last updated 09/11/2017
Requires improvement

Humberside Police is judged to require improvement in the efficiency with which it keeps people safe and reduces crime. This is consistent with last year’s assessment. The force’s understanding of demand is judged to require improvement; it is assessed to require improvement for its use of resources to manage demand; and its planning for future demand is judged to be good.

Overall, Humberside Police has been assessed as requiring improvement in the efficiency with which it keeps people safe and reduces crime. However, we have observed some level of improvement since HMICFRS’ 2016 efficiency inspection. This is positive, but the force must improve in several areas to be assessed as good overall. This year’s inspection was carried out at a time when the force had a temporary chief constable, and since then a new chief constable has been appointed.

Humberside Police has improved in the way that it understands demand for its services. It now has resources in place to identify and analyse data, working with both police and non-police partner organisations to understand its current and predicted future demand better. Nonetheless, inefficient processes and unintended consequences of force activities are affecting how it can manage and reduce its demand.

HMICFRS is pleased to find that the force has started to address the cause for concern found last year, namely the absence of a comprehensive workforce plan, and to see that a five-year workforce plan is in development. The force still needs a better understanding of the skills in its workforce to help identify gaps, support succession planning and recruit new officers and staff for the future. It has a good understanding of its priorities and has plans to meet them. Humberside Police works well with its partners and collaborates with others, such as local authorities and the fire and rescue service. Collaborative working has helped the force make the savings it needs and improve efficiency in the policing services it provides to the public.

Humberside Police plans for the future well. It has produced a change programme based on realistic and sound assumptions. This is aimed at making the financial savings required as well as the efficiencies necessary to provide the workforce and infrastructure needed for the force to provide the policing service it expects.

View the three questions for efficiency

Legitimacy

How legitimate is the force at keeping people safe and reducing crime?

Last updated 12/12/2017
Good

Humberside Police is judged to be good at how legitimately it keeps people safe and reduces crime. For the areas of legitimacy we looked at this year, our overall judgment is the same as last year. The force is judged to be good at treating all of the people it serves with fairness and respect. It is also judge to be good at ensuring that its workforce behaves ethically and lawfully and good at treating its workforce with fairness and respect.

Humberside Police continues to be good in respect of the legitimacy with which it keeps people safe and reduces crime.

The force has clear values and standards which emphasise the importance of treating people with fairness and respect, and these are understood by the workforce and communicated to the public. The force has a mixed understanding of unconscious bias. Training is provided to new starters and newly promoted officers and staff. The force has provided bespoke effective communication training to its frontline workforce, who understand its importance. It gathers data to monitor its use of force and of stop and search powers; it needs, however, to do more to ensure that officers understand what constitutes reasonable grounds for the exercise of these powers and to encourage external scrutiny of their use.

The force continues to develop its ethical decision-making processes; it provides its workforce with the skills and training they need to help them make ethical and fair decisions. It could enhance this further by establishing an effective referral process for submitting and considering ethical questions and dilemmas. A complaints process is available to the public and easy to find on the force website, but the force does not always provide complainants with regular and meaningful updates and does not always record these when it does so. We found that the force is good at identifying, responding to and investigating incidents of discrimination.

HMICFRS has seen an improvement in the way the force treats its officers and staff with fairness and respect. The workforce now have more ways to provide feedback or challenge and to hear about action taken in response. The force has plans to address disproportionality in the recruitment, retention and progression of officers and staff with protected characteristics (such as age, race or sexual orientation). It has continued its focus on improving workforce wellbeing by identifying wellbeing concerns and taking early action to respond to them. It has made a good start on implementing its new performance management process; however, it has yet to be fully used and valued by all members of the workforce. The workforce perceives the force selection processes to be fair, open and transparent.

View the three questions for legitimacy

Other inspections

How well has the force performed in our other inspections?

In addition to the three core PEEL pillars, HMICFRS carries out inspections of a wide range of policing activity throughout the year. Some of these are conducted alongside the PEEL inspections (for instance, our 2016 leadership assessment); others are joint inspections.

Findings from these inspections are published separately to the main PEEL reports, but are taken into account when producing the rounded assessment of each force's performance.

Key facts

Force Area

1357 square miles

Population

0.92m people 3% local 10 yr change

Workforce

75% frontline 78% national level
3.4 per 1000 population 3.6 national level
21% change in local workforce since 2010 15% national change since 2010

Victim-based crimes

0.07 per person 0.06 national level
Local 5 year trend (no change) National 5 year trend (no change)

Cost

53p per person per day local 55p per person per day national

Points of context provided by the force

  • The force covers four local authorities (both urban and rural), has a large port infrastructure and an international tourist, transport and trade network.
  • Among the population of 918,000, there are high levels of deprivation in urban areas and historically high levels of crime in comparison to peers.

Police and crime plan priorities

Aim 1 – To deliver increasingly self-sustaining and safe communities in the Humber Area

Deliverables/Outputs:

Read More
  1. Fewer victims of crime and anti-social behaviour
  2. Provision of services capable of identifying and responding to existing and emerging threats and causes of harm
  3. Improved community cohesion
  4. Enhanced community capability
  5. Engaged and empowered communities and public
  6. Effective service delivery partnerships

Aim 2 – To build public confidence in the agencies involved in creating safer communities

Deliverables/Outputs:

  1. Effective communication and engagement with communities and the public
  2. Increased feeling of safety/security
  3. Services delivered in a style and manner that meets community needs and desires
  4. Identified and understood routes for the public to access services
  5. Power passed to communities
  6. Agencies evidencing Value for Money in services
  7. Transparent accountability mechanisms

Aim 3 – To provide services to victims and the most vulnerable that meet their needs.

Deliverables/Outputs:

  1. Identification of victims
  2. Analysis of vulnerability and victims needs
  3. Effective and accessible range of interventions to protect and signpost the vulnerable and support victims