Kent 2017Read more about Kent 2017
This is HMICFRS’ fourth PEEL (police effectiveness, efficiency and legitimacy) assessment of Kent Police. PEEL is designed to give the public information about how their local police force is performing in several important areas, in a way that is comparable both across England and Wales, and year on year. The assessment is updated throughout the year with our inspection findings and reports.
The extent to which the force is effective at keeping people safe and reducing crime is not yet graded.
The extent to which the force is efficient at keeping people safe and reducing crime is good.
The extent to which the force is legitimate at keeping people safe and reducing crime is not yet graded.
The efficiency inspection findings are published below.
Zoë Billingham, Her Majesty’s Inspector of Constabulary
My overall assessment of Kent’s performance will be published in spring 2018, following the publication of the legitimacy and effectiveness inspections in December 2017 and March 2018, respectively.
How effective is the force at keeping people safe and reducing crime?
How efficient is the force at keeping people safe and reducing crime?
Kent Police is judged to be good in the efficiency with which it keeps people safe and reduces crime. Our overall judgment this year is the same as last year. The force is judged to be outstanding in its understanding of demand; its use of resources to manage demand is assessed to be good; and its planning for future demand is judged to be good.
Kent Police is outstanding in how it ensures it understands demand for its services. The force is continuing to improve its already comprehensive understanding of current and likely future demand, including complex demand such as that from communities less likely to report crime. It makes impressive use of data from partner agencies, ensuring that its analytical products are very informative. The force has used its detailed understanding of demand in its substantial work on a new operating model. It has also established processes to identify and improve internal inefficiencies that create avoidable demand.
The force continually assesses its ability to respond to demand for its services, but there are areas for improvement. The rate that the public are abandoning 101 calls directed to the control room is too high, and sometimes demand is greater than the force’s capacity to manage it, which means its frontline resources are under pressure. Chief officers recognise the significance of these problems and are taking action to manage demand better; they expect that the force’s new operating model will bring further improvements. This model moves a considerable number of the workforce into public protection to help the force tackle the increase in crimes affecting people who are vulnerable.
The force has a good understanding of the skills and capabilities it needs, including in its leaders, and how these will change in the future. The force’s profiling tool helps it to plan its recruitment and training. In its most recent recruitment campaign, the force had some success in increasing the number of black, Asian, and minority ethnic (BAME) candidates. Excellent opportunities are available to both officers and staff for lateral development.
Kent Police has demonstrated a strong commitment to joint working, in particular with Essex Police, and as an active member of the seven-force strategic alliance. The force seeks ideas for improvement from its workforce and encourages its leaders to seek examples of good practice from outside the force.
The force has a good track record of achieving financial savings ahead of schedule. The force’s plans are realistic and they are based on prudent financial assumptions. Despite this, the successful implementation of the new operating model will be challenging for the force.
How legitimate is the force at keeping people safe and reducing crime?
How well has the force performed in our other inspections?
In addition to the three core PEEL pillars, HMICFRS carries out inspections of a wide range of policing activity throughout the year. Some of these are conducted alongside the PEEL inspections (for instance, our 2016 leadership assessment); others are joint inspections.
Findings from these inspections are published separately to the main PEEL reports, but are taken into account when producing the rounded assessment of each force's performance.